From 1f9d7c27c48314a626dd13ae9ba018a2d6d78588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yury Melnichek <melnichek@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:16:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use 250 constant for covering area penalty instead of 1025.
 Should result in larger but more precise index.

---
 indexer/scale_index_builder.hpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/indexer/scale_index_builder.hpp b/indexer/scale_index_builder.hpp
index 0708cd38f1..0eed5590b9 100644
--- a/indexer/scale_index_builder.hpp
+++ b/indexer/scale_index_builder.hpp
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ public:
   {
     if (FeatureShouldBeIndexed(f))
     {
-      vector<int64_t> const cells = covering::CoverFeature(f, 1025);
+      vector<int64_t> const cells = covering::CoverFeature(f, 250);
       for (vector<int64_t>::const_iterator it = cells.begin(); it != cells.end(); ++it)
         m_Sorter.Add(CellFeaturePair(*it, offset));
       ++m_NumFeatures;