diff --git a/routing_common/bicycle_model.cpp b/routing_common/bicycle_model.cpp
index c8ea00024f..155b1bd2d4 100644
--- a/routing_common/bicycle_model.cpp
+++ b/routing_common/bicycle_model.cpp
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ HighwayBasedFactors const kDefaultFactors = GetOneFactorsForBicycleAndPedestrian
 
 SpeedKMpH constexpr kSpeedOffroadKMpH = {1.5 /* weight */, 3.0 /* eta */};
 SpeedKMpH constexpr kSpeedDismountKMpH = {2.0 /* weight */, 4.0 /* eta */};
-// Applies only to contries where cycling is allowed on footways (by default the above dismount speed is used).
+// Applies only to countries where cycling is allowed on footways (by default the above dismount speed is used).
 SpeedKMpH constexpr kSpeedOnFootwayKMpH = {8.0 /* weight */, 10.0 /* eta */};
 
 HighwayBasedSpeeds const kDefaultSpeeds = {
@@ -176,8 +176,8 @@ VehicleModel::SurfaceInitList const kBicycleSurface = {
   {{"psurface", "paved_bad"}, {0.8, 0.8}},
   {{"psurface", "unpaved_good"}, {0.9, 0.9}},
   {{"psurface", "unpaved_bad"}, {0.3, 0.3}},
-  // no dedicated cycleway, doesn't mean that bicycle is not allowed, just lower weight
-  // But why? If nocycleway is tagged explicitly means there is no cycling infra for sure.
+  // No dedicated cycleway doesn't mean that bicycle is not allowed, just lower weight.
+  // If nocycleway is tagged explicitly then there is no cycling infra for sure.
   // Otherwise there is a small chance cycling infra is present though not mapped?
   /// @todo(pastk): this heuristic is controversial, maybe remove completely?
   {{"hwtag", "nocycleway"}, {0.95, 0.95}},
diff --git a/routing_common/routing_common_tests/vehicle_model_test.cpp b/routing_common/routing_common_tests/vehicle_model_test.cpp
index 23402a509c..35ba7e13aa 100644
--- a/routing_common/routing_common_tests/vehicle_model_test.cpp
+++ b/routing_common/routing_common_tests/vehicle_model_test.cpp
@@ -366,6 +366,10 @@ UNIT_CLASS_TEST(VehicleModelTest, BicycleModel_Speeds)
     {cycleway, unpavedBad},
     {path, unpavedGood}, // Its controversial what is preferrable: a good path or a bad cycleway
     {path, yesBicycle, unpavedBad},
+    /// @todo(pastk): "nobicycle" is ignored in speed calculation atm, the routing is just forbidden there.
+    /// But "nobicycle" should result in a dismount speed instead, see https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/9784
+    // {footway, c.GetTypeByPath({"hwtag", "nobicycle"})},
+    // {path, c.GetTypeByPath({"hwtag", "nobicycle"})},
     {path, unpavedBad},
   };