mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git
synced 2025-04-16 10:15:02 +00:00
Marked value_init_test failures on Borland C++ as "expected failures", as discussed with Fernando Cacciola.
[SVN r41402]
This commit is contained in:
parent
7bad39f8de
commit
09b93cdf7f
1 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -5408,6 +5408,22 @@ for more information.
|
|||
versions of the compiler (VC 7.1 and greater).
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="value_init_test"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="borland-5.6*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="borland-5.8*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="borland-5.9*"/>
|
||||
<note author="Niels Dekker">
|
||||
This test typically fails on Borland C++, because of an issue described by
|
||||
<a href="http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1459">
|
||||
ticket #1459, "value_initialized leaves data uninitialized,
|
||||
when using Borland"</a>. The issue is caused by a
|
||||
compiler bug, reported at the website of Codegear/Borland:
|
||||
<a href="http://qc.codegear.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=51854">
|
||||
Report #51854, "Value-initialization: POD struct
|
||||
should be zero-initialized"</a>.
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="operators_test"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-3.4.5_linux_x86_64"/>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue