organicmaps/boost
13
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git synced 2025-04-06 05:55:01 +00:00
Code Issues 1 Projects Releases Wiki Activity Actions

Update explicit-failures-markup.xml

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Automated Commit 2017-10-13 07:25:04 +00:00
parent d34d312805
commit 12f08779ed
1 changed files with 45 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

50
status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
View file

@ -841,8 +841,9 @@
<toolset name="msvc-8.0"/>
<toolset name="msvc-9.0"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Most tests use C++11 lambda functions and variadic macros (even
if technically the library itself does not require C++11).
Test fails because, as most tests, it uses C++11 lambda
functions and variadic macros (even if technically the library
itself does not require C++11).
</note>
</mark-unusable>
<mark-unusable>
@ -851,9 +852,9 @@
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++11~O2"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++11~warn"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 "Clang 3.0 is
pretty old and lambdas there are known not to work" (this
compiler bug seems to be fixed in Clang 3.1 already).
Test fails because this compiler version does not propery
implements lambda functions (this seems to be fixed in Clang
3.1, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312).
</note>
</mark-unusable>
<mark-expected-failures>
@ -883,6 +884,45 @@
instead of `boost::contract::check` on C++17 compilers).
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
<mark-expected-failures>
<test name="old-if_copyable"/>
<test name="old-if_copyable_macro"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.7.2"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.7~c++11"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.6c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.7c+"/>
<toolset name="msvc-10.0"/>
<toolset name="msvc-11.0"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because this complier version does not properly
implement SFINAE causing incorrect errors on substituion
failures for private and protected members (this seems to be
fixed in GCC 4.8 and MSVC 12.0).
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
<mark-expected-failures>
<test name="public_function-virtual_access_multi"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.7.2"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.7~c++11"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.6c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.7c+"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because this compiler version seems to incorrectly
check access level of members in base classes in a context when
only dervied class' members are used (this seems to be fixed
in GCC 4.8, possibly related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973).
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
<mark-expected-failures>
<test name="constructor-smoke"/>
<toolset name="msvc-10.0"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because of MSVC 10.0 bug for lambdas within template
class initialization list (this can be worked around using a
functor bind instead of a lambda but it was fixed in MSVC 11.0).
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
</library>
<!-- coroutine -->