organicmaps/boost
13
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git synced 2025-04-06 14:05:01 +00:00
Code Issues 1 Projects Releases Wiki Activity Actions

Update explicit-failures-markup.xml

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Automated Commit 2017-11-01 05:25:05 +00:00
parent 329bde4ee6
commit 294ebf0a6f
1 changed files with 18 additions and 55 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

73
status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
View file

@ -806,64 +806,27 @@
<!-- contract -->
<library name="contract">
<mark-unusable>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.6"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.7"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.8"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.9"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-5"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-4.0~gnu++98"/>
<!--toolset name="Sandia-clang-4.0"/-->
<!--toolset name="Sandia-gcc-4.7.2"/-->
<!--toolset name="Sandia-gcc-5.4.0"/-->
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.8.1"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++98"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~gnu98"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-5.0~c++98"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-5.0~gnu98"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~c++0x"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~c++98"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~gnu0x"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~gnu98"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~c++0x~O2"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.4~c++0x~warn"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.5"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-4.6"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-7~c++98"/>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-7~gnu98"/>
<toolset name="qcc-4.4.2_x86"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-3.4c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.1c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.2c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.3c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.4c+"/>
<toolset name="gcc-mngw-gnu-4.5c+"/>
<toolset name="msvc-7.1"/>
<toolset name="msvc-8.0"/>
<toolset name="msvc-9.0"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because, as most tests, it uses C++11 lambda
functions and variadic macros (even if technically the library
itself does not require C++11).
</note>
</mark-unusable>
<mark-unusable>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++11"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~gnu11"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++11~O2"/>
<toolset name="clang-gnu-linux-3.0~c++11~warn"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because this compiler version does not properly
implements lambda functions (this seems to be fixed in Clang
3.1, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312).
Tests fails on this compiler because it does not properly
implement lambda functions (most tests use lambda functions,
even if technically the library itself does not require C++11).
This seems to be fixed in Clang 3.1 (see
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312).
</note>
</mark-unusable>
<mark-unusable>
<toolset name="gcc-gnu-6"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because, as most tests, it uses C++11 lambda
functions and variadic macros (even if technically the library
itself does not require C++11).
Tests fail to link on this compiler when libc++ is used, but
they link fine with libstdc++ (unfortunately these toolset names
do not diferentiate between libc++ and libstdc++ so libstdc++
tests had to be marked as expected failures for this compiler
as well even if they actually compile and run fine).
</note>
</mark-unusable>
<mark-expected-failures>
@ -904,8 +867,8 @@
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
This test fails because this complier does not properly
implement SFINAE giving incorrect errors on substituion failures
for private and protected members (this seems to be fixed in GCC
4.8 and MSVC 12.0).
for private and protected members.
This seems to be fixed in GCC 4.8 and MSVC 12.0.
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
<mark-expected-failures>
@ -917,8 +880,8 @@
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
This test fails because this compiler seems to incorrectly check
access level of members in base classes in a context when only
dervied class members are used (this seems to be fixed in GCC
4.8, possibly related to
dervied class members are used.
This seems to be fixed in GCC 4.8 (possibly related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973).
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
@ -926,10 +889,10 @@
<test name="constructor-smoke"/>
<toolset name="msvc-10.0"/>
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
Test fails because of a MSVC 10.0 bug for lambdas within
template class initialization list (this can be worked around
using a functor bind instead of a lambda but it was fixed in
MSVC 11.0).
This test fails because of a MSVC 10.0 bug for lambdas within
template class initialization list.
This can be worked around using a functor bind instead of a
lambda, but it is fixed in MSVC 11.0.
</note>
</mark-expected-failures>
</library>