mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git
synced 2025-04-14 09:00:36 +00:00
refer to "Library Submission Process" instead of explaining outdated procedures
[SVN r8860]
This commit is contained in:
parent
34d634ab4e
commit
79bf2e4b63
1 changed files with 2 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -23,11 +23,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<h1>Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b> An initial review by the
|
||||
library master filters out libraries which do not meet the absolute requirements (must be
|
||||
C++, ownership clear, reasonable format, etc.) The author is free to rework and
|
||||
resubmit libraries which do not pass initial muster. This is encouraged, particularly when
|
||||
reviewers like the idea behind a library but feel that details are lacking.</p>
|
||||
<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b>
|
||||
See <a href="submission_process.htm">Library Submission Process</a></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><b>Is there any assurance libraries actually work as claimed?</b> No. The review
|
||||
process will hopefully eliminate the most seriously flawed libraries, but a well
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue