mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/boost.git
synced 2025-04-11 07:41:06 +00:00
Update explicit-failures-markup.xml
[skip ci]
This commit is contained in:
Automated Commit
parent
3502f4026f
commit
996ce43c00
1 changed files with 13 additions and 62 deletions
|
|
@ -894,7 +894,7 @@
|
|||
<!-- contract -->
|
||||
<library name="contract">
|
||||
<mark-unusable>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-6"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="xxgcc-6"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
Tests fail to link on this compiler because of a bug in its STL
|
||||
implementation (undefined references to `operator delete`, see
|
||||
|
|
@ -902,9 +902,9 @@
|
|||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-unusable>
|
||||
<mark-unusable>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-3.4c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.1c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.2c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="xxgcc-3.4c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="xxgcc-4.1c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="xxgcc-4.2c+"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
Even tests that do not use C++11 lambda functions fail on this
|
||||
compiler because it incorrectly attempts an extra copy when
|
||||
|
|
@ -928,7 +928,6 @@
|
|||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="disable-audit"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.9"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-5"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.6"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.7"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.8"/>
|
||||
|
|
@ -958,61 +957,20 @@
|
|||
<test name="public_function-throwing_post"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-virtual"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-virtual_branch"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-4.0~gnu++11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-4.0~gnu++14"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-4.0~gnu++1z"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-*~gnu++11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-*~gnu++14"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-*~gnu++1z"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
This test fails because of a libcxxrt bug on Clang for FreeBSD
|
||||
which causes `std::uncaught_exception` to not work properly on
|
||||
re-throws (see https://github.com/pathscale/libcxxrt/issues/49).
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="specify-auto_error"/>
|
||||
<test name="specify-auto_pre_error"/>
|
||||
<test name="specify-auto_pre_old_error"/>
|
||||
<test name="specify-auto_pre_old_post_error"/>
|
||||
<test name="specify-auto_pre_old_post_except_error"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="intel-linux-linux"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-darwin*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-darwin*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-darwin*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="*1z*"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
This test fails because C++17 guarantees no copies on function
|
||||
returns by value (so this library can only give run-time errors,
|
||||
and not compile-time errors, if auto declarations are misused
|
||||
instead of using the `boost::contract::check` type explicitly on
|
||||
C++17 compilers).
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args0"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args0_no_tva"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args1"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args1_no_tva"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args2"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args2_no_tva"/>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-max_args_no_tva"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-6.1c+"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
It is not clear why this test fails but when trying to install
|
||||
MinGW GCC 6.1 using `mingw-get` it says that such a compiler
|
||||
version does not exist (so this issue could not be investigated
|
||||
any further).
|
||||
This is fixed in MinGW GCC 6.2.
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="old-if_copyable"/>
|
||||
<test name="old-if_copyable_macro"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7.2"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7~c++11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="qcc-4.7.3_arm"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="qcc-4.7.3_x86"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="msvc-10.0"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="msvc-11.0"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
|
|
@ -1024,11 +982,8 @@
|
|||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-protected_error"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.0~c++11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.0~gnu11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.0~c++11~O2"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.0~c++11~warn"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="clang-linux-3.0~*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6*"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
This test fails because SFINAE on this complier seems to not
|
||||
fail as it should when a derived class tries to call a
|
||||
|
|
@ -1040,12 +995,8 @@
|
|||
</mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<mark-expected-failures>
|
||||
<test name="public_function-virtual_access_multi"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7.2"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7~c++11"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="qcc-4.7.3_arm"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="qcc-4.7.3_x86"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7c+"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.6*"/>
|
||||
<toolset name="gcc-4.7*"/>
|
||||
<note author="Lorenzo Caminiti">
|
||||
This test fails because this compiler seems to incorrectly check
|
||||
access level of members in base classes in a context when only
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue