From 996efec87d42544a308cc80dacd083a31979fdc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:44:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Marked up qcc failures: these should have been marked up
 already really?

[SVN r35952]
---
 status/explicit-failures-markup.xml | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml b/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
index 86559439dd..a6acb0a79c 100644
--- a/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
+++ b/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml
@@ -4042,9 +4042,10 @@ for more information.
             <test name="tr1_is_abstract_test"/>
             <toolset name="gcc-3.3.*"/>
             <toolset name="gcc-3.2*"/>
+            <toolset name="qcc-3.3*"/>
             <note author="John Maddock">
                These tests fail due to a known compiler bug 
-               that is fixed in more recent releases.  Users are
+               that is fixed in more recent GNU compiler releases.  Users are
                very unlikely to encounter this as a real problem 
                in practice.
             </note>
@@ -4184,6 +4185,7 @@ for more information.
                 <toolset name="gcc-3.2*"/>
                 <toolset name="gcc-3.3*"/>
                 <toolset name="gcc-3_3*"/>
+                <toolset name="qcc-3_3*"/>
                 <toolset name="sunpro-5_3-sunos"/>
                 <toolset name="tru64cxx65*"/>
                 <toolset name="hp_cxx-65*"/>