From ac1e657fdf6d49d74bdff979373bc0cf198df52d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:44:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] typo fix

[SVN r8528]
---
 more/discussion_policy.htm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/more/discussion_policy.htm b/more/discussion_policy.htm
index 14eb913b9d..5bd026a901 100644
--- a/more/discussion_policy.htm
+++ b/more/discussion_policy.htm
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ degenerating into a shouting match.</p>
     or &quot;won't that fail to compile, or am I missing something?&quot; is a
     lot smoother than &quot;That's really stupid - it won't compile.&quot;&nbsp;
     Saying &quot;that fails to compile for me, and seems to violate section
-    n.n.n or the standard&quot; would be yet another way to be firm without
+    n.n.n of the standard&quot; would be yet another way to be firm without
     being abrasive.</li>
   <li>If most of the discussion has been code-free generalities, posting a bit
     of sample code can focus people on the practical issues.</li>