generic atomicops: promote Acquire_Store() and Release_Load() to use SEQ_CST fence
__atomic_store_n() cannot take a memory model argument of __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, and __atomic_load_n() cannot take a memory model argument of __ATOMIC_RELEASE, per the GCC documentation: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html On Clang this generates a -Watomic-memory-ordering warning. Promote the fences in Acquire_Store() and Release_Load() to the stronger __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST memory model, which ought to be safe. Note that there are no actual uses of Acquire_Store() or Release_Load() in protobuf, though. This follows the TSAN atomicops implementation, which also uses SEQ_CST fences for these functions. (Fixes #25.)
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d5f1e1efb
commit
cc0a047384
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ inline void MemoryBarrier() {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void Acquire_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
||||
__atomic_store_n(ptr, value, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
|
||||
__atomic_store_n(ptr, value, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline void Release_Store(volatile Atomic32* ptr, Atomic32 value) {
|
||||
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ inline Atomic32 Acquire_Load(volatile const Atomic32* ptr) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inline Atomic32 Release_Load(volatile const Atomic32* ptr) {
|
||||
return __atomic_load_n(ptr, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
|
||||
return __atomic_load_n(ptr, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __LP64__
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue